Diabetic Foot Ulcer Etiopathogenesis And Various Treatment Modalities A Prospective Study

Main Article Content

Mohamad Waseem Dar
Barkat Anwar Shah
Abdul Ghani
Manish Singh

Abstract

Background: Diabetic foot is a serious complication of diabetes which aggravates the patient’s condition and also having significant socioeconomic impact.


Aim: The aim of this study is to summarize the causes and pathogenetic mechanisms leading to diabetic foot, and to focus on the management of this important health issue. Increasing physicians’ awareness and hence their ability to identify the ‘‘foot at risk,’’ along with proper foot care, may prevent diabetic foot ulceration and thus reduce the risk of amputation.


Method:   A total of 63 diabetic patients with foot ulcers were included in this prospective observational study conducted at Government Medical college Jammu over a period of 12 months.     Diabetic patients with new foot ulcers presenting during a 12-month period had demographics and ulcer characteristics recorded at presentation. Ulcers were followed-up until an outcome was noted.


Results: The majority of ulcers were neuropathic (66.0%) and present on the forefoot (77.8%) with a median (interquartile range) area of 1.5 (0.6±4.0) cm2. Amputations were performed for 7% of ulcers; 65% healed; 16% remained unhealed and 2% of patients died. The median (95% confidence interval) time to healing was 10 (8.8±11.6) weeks. Ulcer area at presentation was greater in the amputation group compared to healed ulcers (3.9 vs. 1.2 cm2 , P < 0.0001). Ulcer area correlated with healing time (rs = 0.27, P < 0.0001) and predicted healing (P = 0.04). 


Conclusions: Ulcer area, a measure of ulcer size, predicts the outcome of foot ulcers. Its inclusion into a diabetic wound classification system will make that system a better predictor of outcome.

Article Details

How to Cite
Mohamad Waseem Dar, Barkat Anwar Shah, Abdul Ghani, & Manish Singh. (2023). Diabetic Foot Ulcer Etiopathogenesis And Various Treatment Modalities A Prospective Study. Journal for ReAttach Therapy and Developmental Diversities, 6(1), 2046–2051. https://doi.org/10.53555/jrtdd.v6i1.3170
Section
Articles
Author Biographies

Mohamad Waseem Dar

Postgraduate Scholar, Department of Orthopedics, Government Medical College Jammu, India.

Barkat Anwar Shah

Postgraduate Scholar, Department of Orthopedics, Government Medical College Jammu, India.

Abdul Ghani

Professor, Department of Orthopedics, Government Medical College Jammu, India.

Manish Singh

Assistant Professor, Department of Orthopedics, Government Medical College Jammu, India.

References

Moxey PW, Gogalniceanu P, Hinchliffe RJ, et al. Lower extremity amputations—a review of global variability in incidence. Diabet Med. 2011;28:1144–1153. doi: 10.1111/j.1464-5491.2011.03279.x.

Kumar S, Ashe HA, Parnell LN, et al. The prevalence of foot ulceration and its correlates in type 2 diabetic patients: a population-based study. Diabet Med. 1994;11:480–4.

Tesfaye S, Stevens LK, Stephenson JM, et al. Prevalence of diabetic peripheral neuropathy and its relation to glycaemic control and potential risk factors: the EURODIAB IDDM Complications Study. Diabetologia. 1996;39:1377–84.

Prompers L, Huijberts M, Apelqvist J, et al. High prevalence of ischaemia, infection and serious comorbidity in patients with diabetic foot disease in Europe. Baseline results from the Eurodiale study. Diabetologia. 2007;50:18–25.

Benotmane A, Mohammedi F, Ayad F, Kadi K, Azzouz A. Diabetic foot lesions: etiologic and prognostic factors. Diabetes Metab. 2000;26:113–7.

Lavery LA, Armstrong DG, Vela SA, Quebedeaux TL, Fleischli JG. Practical criteria for screening patients at high risk for diabetic foot ulceration. Arch Intern Med. 1998;158:157–62.

Malgrange D, Richard JL, Leymarie F, French Working Group On The Diabetic Foot. Screening diabetic patients at risk for foot ulceration. A multicentre hospital-based study in France. Diabetes Metab. 2003;29:261–8.

Prompers L, Huijberts M, Schaper N, et al. Resource utilisation and costs associated with the treatment of diabetic foot ulcers. Prospective data from the Eurodiale Study. Diabetologia. 2008;51:1826–34.

Tan T, Shaw EJ, Siddiqui F, Kandaswamy P, Barry PW, Guideline Development Group. Inpatient management of diabetic foot problems: summary of NICE guidance. BMJ. 2011;342:d1280.

Beckert S, Witte M, Wicke C, Ko nigsrainer A, Coerper S. A new wound-based severity score for diabetic foot ulcers. Diabetes Care. 2006;29:988-92.

Kumar ST, Arava S, Pavan BM, Guru Kiran CS, Chandan GB, Kumar NM. Diabetic ulcer severity score: clinical validation and outcome. In Surg J. 2016;3:1606-10.

Sharma M, Sharma A, Ram SG. Diabetic foot ulcers: a prospective study of 100 patients based on wound based severity score. J Dent Med Sci. 2014;13:79-89.

Shashikala CK, Nandini VK, Kagwad S. Validation of diabetic ulcer severity score (DUSS). Ann Int Med Den Res. 2017;3(1):SG27-30.

Kummankandath SA, Mohammed ST, Karatparambil AA, Nadakkavil MM, Pappala RT. Validation of diabetic ulcer severity score. Int Surg J. 2016;3: 1509-16.

Boyko EJ, Ahroni JH, Smith DG, Davingnon D. Increased mortality associated with diabetic foot ulcer. Diabet M ed 1996; 13: 967±972.

Kertesz D, Chow AW. Infected pressure and diabetic ulce rs. Clin Geriatr Med 1992; 8: 835±852.

Hansson C, Andersson E, Swanbeck G. A follow-up study of leg and foot ulcer patients. Acta Derm Venreol 1987; 67: 496±5 00.

Nelzen O, Bergqvist D, Lindhagen A. Long-term progn osis for patients with chronic leg ulcers: a prosp ective cohort study. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg 1997; 13: 500±508.

Hehenberg er K, Heil born JD, Brismar K, Hansso n A. Inhibited proliferation of broblasts derived from chronic diabetic wounds and normal dermal fibroblasts treated w ith high glucose is associated with increased formatio n of L -lactate . Wound Repair Regen 1998; 6: 135±141.

Loots MA, L amme EN, Mekkes JR, Bos JD, Middelkoo p E. Cultured broblasts from chronic diabetic wounds on the lower extremity (non-insulin dependent diabetes mellitus) showed disturbe d proliferation. Arch Dermatol Res 1999; 291: 93±99 .

Loots MA, Lamme EN, Zeegelaar J, Mekkes JR, Bos JD, Middelkoop E. Dif ferences in cellu lar infiltrate and extracellular matrix of chronic diabetic and venous ulcers versus acute wounds . J Invest Dermatol 1998; 111: 850±857.

Koivukangas V, Annala AP, Salmaela PI, Oikarinen A. Delayed restoration of epidermal barrier function after suction blister injury in patients w ith diabetes mel litus. Diabet Med 1999; 16: 563±567.

Blakytny R, Jude EB, Gibson JM, Boulton AJM, Ferguson MWJ. Lack of insulin-like growth factor 1 (IGF 1) in basal keratinocy te layer of diabetic skin and diabetic foot ulcers. J P ath 2000; 190: 589±594.

Apelqvist J, Castenfors J, Larsson J, Stenstro È m A, Agardh C-D. Wound classification is more important than site of ulceration in the outcome of diabetic foot ulcers. Diabet M ed 1989; 6: 526±530.

Xie X, McGregor M, Dendukuri N. The clinical effectiveness of negative pressure wound therapy: a systematic review. J Wound Care. 2010;19:490–5.

McCallon SK, Knight CA, Valiulus JP, Cunningham MW, McCulloch JM, Farinas LP. Vacuum-assisted closure versus saline-moistened gauze in the healing of postoperative diabetic foot wounds. Ostomy Wound Manage. 2000;46(28–32): 34.

Eginton MT, Brown KR, Seabrook GR, Towne JB, Cambria RA. A prospective randomized evaluation of negative-pressure wound dressings for diabetic foot wounds. Ann Vasc Surg. 2003;17:645–9.

Armstrong DG, Diabetic Foot Study Consortium. Negative pressure wound therapy after partial diabetic foot amputation: a multicentre, randomised controlled trial. Lancet. 2005;366:1704–10.